Diana: Conspiracy Theories

December 2, 2019 By

Since the tragic death of Princess Diana, it has been claimed that there was an orchestrated criminal conspiracy to end the life of Diana, Princess of Wales. But could the British Royal family really be behind the murder of a lady who became an international icon? As Diana was thrust into the Monarch and the public spotlight, she helped change the public perception of the Royal family. She often struggled with a turbulent private life, which was made public to the world. We take an in depth look into the life and death of Lady Diana and ask questions as to why the ambulance took between 1 hour and 15 minutes and 1 hour and 40 minutes to get to the hospital in the middle of the night when normally it should take 11 minutes during rush hour. Why was the Mercedes s280 the only available car that night, which had previously been stolen and was found to have been missing the onboard computer chip which controls the acceleration, steering, speed and breaking of the car? With interviews and exclusive footage we delve into the conspiracy that has left the world wanting answers for years. This is Princess Diana…Conspiracy Theories.


6 Comments on "Diana: Conspiracy Theories"

  1. chris webb
    December 2, 2019

    couldnt stand the woman, manipulative paranoid narcissist. Pissed up driver... bad accident end of story!

  2. Elizabeth Blackwell
    December 2, 2019

    Diana had a very small injury – but in the wrong place. Diana’s death is a classic example of the way we say, after almost every death: if only. If only she had hit the seat in front at a slightly different angle. If only she had been thrown forward 10mph more slowly.
    If only she had been put in an ambulance immediately. But the biggest if only, in Diana’s case, was within her own control. If only she had been wearing a seat belt. Had she been restrained, she would probably have appeared in public two days later with a black eye, perhaps a bit breathless from the fractured ribs and with a broken arm in a sling.

    The pathology of her death is indisputable. How the RF was involved is beyond me.

  3. Jonell Potter
    December 2, 2019

    The Queen and Charles had her killed ! She was an force to be reckoned with ! Stood her ground with them! And we the people adored her! She did so much good for people! And they couldn't stand her popularity! And her kindness! She loved her boy's she gave or tried to give them a normal life! Charles didn't love her he only wanted children! I pray to god that the truth comes out and her boy's finally learn the truth! She would still be here today had she not married that evil man!! Who loved another woman the day they married! What a punk he had to do as he was told by his mum! He chose a ugly duckling over a beautiful woman! And mother of his sons. She was killed August 31 and her divorce was August 28th 1998. A year after her divorce! They could have saved her i believe but were ordered not too !! This is my opinion and it forever will be !!

  4. Hazel Walsh
    December 2, 2019

    No! The verdict was unlawful death caused by the following vehicles! NOT negligent driving by Andre Paul! The following Vehicles were the white fiat uno and some motorbikes. Which were proved not to be photographers as they were all accounted for and were much further back when the accident happened. These mystery bikes came from a slip road by the side of the tunnel and surrounded the Mercedes going into the tunnel...And all these drivers have never been identified.

  5. Ashley Onix
    December 2, 2019

    crazy to think there could be foul play...

  6. david howard
    December 2, 2019

    What Paul Burrel is describing is paranoia.

Would you like to share your thoughts?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *